Jan 6, 2022
Recirculating Range Hoods Do Too Little to Protect Your Lungs
The use of recirculating hood fans in US homes is a health hazard as they are ineffective in removing toxic particles and fumes from cooking. Studies show that gas ranges produce more pollutants than electric, and the effectiveness of carbon filters degrades rapidly. While adding outdoor ventilation may be difficult for renters, it is the best solution for removing indoor pollution. Filtration modifications to existing hoods may be possible but should be done by the manufacturer. There is currently no adequate recirculating hood solution for indoor air quality.
By: Matt Power
While traveling recently, I stayed in an apartment with one of the recirculating type hood fans. I’ve installed many fans that vent to the outdoors, which come with their own caveats (makeup air is required to balance the outflow), but I hadn’t experienced the unpleasantry of indoor cooking without one for many years.
Like many widely used products in U.S. homes, this one’s poorly understood, inadequate to the task, and, frankly, a health hazard. Cooking on the gas top, the smoke alarm in a bedroom 30 feet away would fire off about half the time.
Just how bad do these things perform? I set out to discover some research.
Particles of Interest
If you follow indoor air quality at all, you’ve heard of PM2.5. It’s the size of air pollution especially dangerous to human lungs, less than 2.5 micrometers wide. To capture it indoors with any type of filtration media, you need something upward of MERV 10, or a HEPA filter. You also need a certain speed of airflow, and the performance of the filters changes over time (sometimes improving). Gas ranges also produce nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
A study of air pollution from cooking in California made some rough estimates as to how many homes have bad air, based on the popularity of recirculating range hoods. The author writes:
“Logue (Logue, 2014) simulated assuming no use of hoods, that in 55–70% of the Californian dwellings the NAAQS 1-hour acute standard is exceeded during a typical week in winter. By assuming hoods with the effectiveness of capturing 55% of the emissions, the exceedance percentage is reduced to 18-–30% of the dwellings.”
Let me highlight three of the key findings from this study by Plet Jacobs:
- Gas stoves pollute more than electric: “The World Health Organization (WHO) states that having a gas stove is equivalent to an increased average indoor level of 28μg/m3 , compared to homes with electric stoves, and meta-analysis showed that an increase in indoor nitrogen dioxide of 28 μg/m3 is associated with a 20% increased risk of lower respiratory illness in children.”
- Hotter baking ramps up pollution: “The PM2.5 emission is strongly dependent on the temperature, increasing the baking temperature from 180 to 220 ⁰C resulted in a four-fold higher peak concentration.”
- Carbon filters degrade rapidly: “An aging test performed on the carbon filter of the recirculation hood simulating 19 days of cooking (20 minutes/day 5 kW) showed an initial NO2 reduction of 56% and after 19 days only 19%.” Bad to worse after less than a month of regular use.
The study’s results sum up the problem succinctly. Recirculating hoods remove about 30% of PM2.5 particles, and a “fresh carbon filter” starts out removing 60% of NO2, but quickly loses its efficiency, dropping to a dismal 20% performance within a few weeks.
So where do you go from here? If you’re a renter or own a home with a central kitchen, adding cooking ventilation to the outdoors may be denied by your landlord, or present a big infrastructure challenge. You understandably don’t want to rip out an entire ceiling to run an exhaust duct to an outside wall. That was your builder’s job, and he frankly failed in an epic way.
Another “fix” suggested by the authors of the study I mentioned is to somehow add filtration to your existing recirculating hood. Ultimately, however, this modification would probably need to be done by the manufacturer, not the end-user. Sorry renters. Your only real avenue for improvement will be to convince your landlord that putting in a proper out-venting hood needs to happen.
One angle you could mention is the fact that recirculating systems, over time, will likely cause staining and odors to lodge in the kitchen. Given the choice of repainting and repairing, installing a ducted system may seem economically prudent.
I’ve seen discussion boards suggesting the addition of an inline MERV filter to a 5-inch duct above the recirculating fan, but no research on how well this filter might work, nor its potential negative impact on the lifespan of the fan.
I would definitely not recommend a DIY fix, such as taping a MERV filter over the carbon filter. Not only might this create a fire hazard, but it’s also unlikely to work because many of these recirculating fans lack the CFM of airflow to create enough flow through the filter during cooking.
If you take indoor air quality seriously, and many studies suggest that you should, surface-mount the ducting you need and move the pollution outdoors, where it belongs. If you don’t like the look of exposed metal ducts, box it in, and paint it. As a failsafe, to make sure you’re clearing the air adequately, you can add a smart system such as Panasonic Cosmos to your home that senses levels of pollutants in different rooms, then activates bath fans, ERVs, or range hoods as needed to keep pollution down.
To my knowledge, there’s no recirculating hood solution that’s adequate to the task of removing toxic PM2.5 particles and NO2 fumes from cooking. If you believe such a product exists and can document its performance, I’m happy to consider it for an addendum to this article.
This article originally appeared on Green Builder Media and is reprinted with permission